The 1934 economic rebound was widely shared, with strong income gains for the vast majority, the bottom 90 percent.In 2010, we saw the opposite as the vast majority lost ground.
National income gained overall in 2010, but all of the gains were among the top 10 percent.
Even within those 15.6 million households, the gains were extraordinarily concentrated among the super-rich, the top one percent of the top one percent.
Just 15,600 super-rich households pocketed an astonishing 37 percent of the entire national gain.
The different results in 1934 and 2010 show how a major shift in federal policy hurts the vast majority and benefits the super-rich.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
The US Upper Crust Rebounds
Not much can be added to tag along with this chart that shows so dramatically who the winners and losers have been in the recovery to date. The chart is an analysis of recent IRS data by economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty illustrates directions in US incomes after the Great Recession and the Great Depression. Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and tax code expert David Clay Johnson suggests this shows plenty about our tax and economic policy direction.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
One Percenter Dairy Industry
It is well known that Vermont’s dairy farms are struggling. So an article titled "Even Dairy Farming Has a 1 Percent" caught my eye. Planet Money's Adam Davidson’s short piece in the New York Times outlines familiar but nonetheless disturbing trends.
Davidson visited a dairy farm in New Jersey where a father-son team is barely staying ahead of the curve. The hard-working pair running this top-producing farm are on the job daily from 4:30 am to 7 pm and trade off Sundays – yet each earns less than minimum wage. All pretty familiar stuff to some Vermonters. Our state has seen some positive trends in value-added cheese processing and continues to focus on local fixes including expanding branding, aggressive marketing, and increasing Dairy Management Teams to reduce production costs.Major structural problems persist and dairy closures continue.
A modern dairy farm can produce large quantities of milk, but the task of balancing demand with supply is what haunts the industry. With accelerated consolidation and commoditization of the industry, a few big players are benefiting by trading dairy and feed products like fast-paced derivative traders. Planet Money:
This leaves many small operations on the margins and speeds consolidation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that for the first time ever three percent of the dairies in the US now produce slightly more than half of the milk supply. Just over 50 percent of the milk supply came from farms with 1,000 cows or more. This shift happened quickly, since 2006 when 38.1 percent was produced by farms of this size. The biggest profits are clustered at the top one percent who control a large part of the industry.
The One Percent Dairy Industry "Problems loom for US dairy farms as output rises" says Agrimoney.com, an online industry publication. Dairy output is rising beyond sales capacity, as experts are pleading for industry self-control.
Yet the Canadian dairy industry – using a completely different (and very un-American) model – seems relatively stable by comparison. In Canada a system of production quotas dating back more than 40 years protects farmers from conglomerates. The Canadian Dairy Commission and provincial marketing boards regulate prices paid to farmers and control the amount each can produce. It is a complicated system in which a farmer must purchase production quotas that determine the amount of milk that can be produced for sale. Typical Canadian dairy farms have about 70 cows (the average VT dairy farm has 130 cows); quotas (essentially one cow) can cost upwards of $20,000(Canadian). While this cost makes entering the daily business in Canada difficult and expensive, existing farms reportedly enjoy a stable business environment. A University of Illinois study of Canadian farmers'
perceptions of government dairy regulation found that farmers trusted the government system to protect their interests despite systemic inefficiencies.
What is true in Canada is also true in the US: once you establish a system and people are invested in it, it’s going to be very hard to change. Canadian farmers perceive the system benefits and protects them, but who benefits here in the US, and specifically, here in Vermont? Our farms are vanishing, while some of our farmers barely earn minimum wage. Three percent of dairies produce half the milk. So we know the dairy one percent – massive farms and futures traders – making the biggest profits will resist change to a system that now benefits them and devastates small farms.
Finally, as near as I can determine a gallon of milk in Canada costs $2.41(US) and $3.30(US) in the States. Who benefits more?
Davidson visited a dairy farm in New Jersey where a father-son team is barely staying ahead of the curve. The hard-working pair running this top-producing farm are on the job daily from 4:30 am to 7 pm and trade off Sundays – yet each earns less than minimum wage. All pretty familiar stuff to some Vermonters. Our state has seen some positive trends in value-added cheese processing and continues to focus on local fixes including expanding branding, aggressive marketing, and increasing Dairy Management Teams to reduce production costs.Major structural problems persist and dairy closures continue.
A modern dairy farm can produce large quantities of milk, but the task of balancing demand with supply is what haunts the industry. With accelerated consolidation and commoditization of the industry, a few big players are benefiting by trading dairy and feed products like fast-paced derivative traders. Planet Money:
… dairy farming has its own 1 percent: that tiny sliver of massive farms, with thousands of cows, that make the biggest profits and are better equipped to pay agriculture-futures experts to help them manage risk.They continue to invest and grow.
The markets offer a stunning range of complex agricultural financial products. Dairy farmers (or, for that matter, anybody) can buy and sell milk and animal-feed futures, which allow them to lock in favorable prices, hedge against bad news in the future and so forth. There’s also a new product that combines feed and milk futures into one financial package, allowing farmers to guarantee a minimum margin no matter what happens to commodity markets down the road.
This leaves many small operations on the margins and speeds consolidation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that for the first time ever three percent of the dairies in the US now produce slightly more than half of the milk supply. Just over 50 percent of the milk supply came from farms with 1,000 cows or more. This shift happened quickly, since 2006 when 38.1 percent was produced by farms of this size. The biggest profits are clustered at the top one percent who control a large part of the industry.
The One Percent Dairy Industry "Problems loom for US dairy farms as output rises" says Agrimoney.com, an online industry publication. Dairy output is rising beyond sales capacity, as experts are pleading for industry self-control.
Producers needed to question whether extra output of some 600m pounds a month "can be readily sold at prices anywhere close to what is needed to generate milk prices high enough to cover costs of production" said Milk Producers' Council John Kaczor
Yet the Canadian dairy industry – using a completely different (and very un-American) model – seems relatively stable by comparison. In Canada a system of production quotas dating back more than 40 years protects farmers from conglomerates. The Canadian Dairy Commission and provincial marketing boards regulate prices paid to farmers and control the amount each can produce. It is a complicated system in which a farmer must purchase production quotas that determine the amount of milk that can be produced for sale. Typical Canadian dairy farms have about 70 cows (the average VT dairy farm has 130 cows); quotas (essentially one cow) can cost upwards of $20,000(Canadian). While this cost makes entering the daily business in Canada difficult and expensive, existing farms reportedly enjoy a stable business environment. A University of Illinois study of Canadian farmers'
perceptions of government dairy regulation found that farmers trusted the government system to protect their interests despite systemic inefficiencies.
"Farmers may change their management practices because quotas are now the single largest capital investment, which restricts herd size,"said University of Illinois agricultural economist Lia Nogueira. "They don't have an incentive to export their milk because the price that they would get in the world market is much lower than the domestic market. It shows that government intervention and controlling an industry can change the way farmers do things. Once you establish a system and people are so invested in that system, it's going to be very hard to make any substantial changes even if it's clear that the program is inefficient."
What is true in Canada is also true in the US: once you establish a system and people are invested in it, it’s going to be very hard to change. Canadian farmers perceive the system benefits and protects them, but who benefits here in the US, and specifically, here in Vermont? Our farms are vanishing, while some of our farmers barely earn minimum wage. Three percent of dairies produce half the milk. So we know the dairy one percent – massive farms and futures traders – making the biggest profits will resist change to a system that now benefits them and devastates small farms.
Finally, as near as I can determine a gallon of milk in Canada costs $2.41(US) and $3.30(US) in the States. Who benefits more?
Friday, March 9, 2012
Joe the Wurzelbacher Wins in Ohio Primary
Ohio’s Samuel Wurzelbacher has won a tough Republican US Congressional primary. The conservative political newcomer is perhaps best known by his stage name “Joe the Plumber”. Although never a licensed plumber and not named “Joe”, Wurzelbacher will soon face 15 term Ohio Democratic Rep.Marcy Kaptur after
barely winning his primary race.
Despite outspending his opponent six to one, Wurzelbacher only narrowly won the Republican race with 51 percent of Toledo-area residents picking "Joe the Plumber" compared with the 48 percent who chose Steve Kraus, an auctioneer and real estate agent.
Wurzelbacher not only had a massive monetary advantage but also scored the backing of big name Republicans, such as Herman Cain, and appeared at rallies with both Romney and Santorum.
Wurzelbacher’s main claim to fame came in 2008 when appearing as “Joe the Plumber” he famously asked then candidate Obama a confrontational question regarding taxes. This one performance sparked his rapid rise in Republican Party politics(always on the lookout for quality talent)and he made guest appearances in character as “Joe” with John McCain and Sarah Palin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)